How odd it would be to send Al Sharpton and David Duke back in time to witness the banality of black on white slavery and to understand that our notions of their perceived conflicts are predicated on social constructs that arose out of the particular history of European Enlightenment, Colonialism, and the Pseudoscience of Anthropology (spoken as an Anthropology major myself.)
Reading Time: 6 minutes
Racism on the rise? If so, it is your fault!

With recent events surrounding police violence towards blacks in the United States, I would like to dedicate today’s #PhilanthrophyFriday post to the topic of racism.

We will visit Nobel Prizes for sale, noble intentions questioned, and then end with the nobility of the human spirit.

I believe that racism is a convenience that trumps reason only when activated by fear. We all see the world, note the differences in appearance and behavior, and our mind tries to organize our thoughts based upon inculcated prejudice, our own experience, and divine intuition.

When scarcity is introduced, as in the fear of safety, material wealth, social attainment, it is natural to try to seek strength in numbers and band together with our own self-identification group, to the exclusion of the “other”.

This scarcity can be experienced on a racial level, a socio-economic level, a political affiliation level, or a citizen’s rights level.

In researching my screenplay about Hypatia, a philosopher in the Late Roman Empire, I was fascinated that the concept of Roman citizenship was a political one, like that of Americans versus illegal immigrants. People we might consider “black” would routinely own “whites” slaves because at that time, the wars with Goths would have meant the majority of slaves were Germanic in appearance, language and culture.

How odd it would be to send Al Sharpton and David Duke back in time to witness the banality of black on white slavery and to understand that our notions of their perceived conflicts are predicated on social constructs that arose out of the particular history of European Enlightenment, Colonialism, and the Pseudoscience of Anthropology (spoken as an Anthropology major myself.)

The scientific and incontrovertible truth is that a species level classification of race touted by Carl Linnaeus, the father of species taxonomy, is a non-starter as all Homo Sapiens Sapiens appear to arise from the same East African origins and can interbreed without difficulty.  As if we needed more proof that having brilliant scientific ideas doesn’t mean all our thoughts are valid, here comes the Greek tragedy of DNA-discoverer, Dr. James Watson, of Watson and Crick fame….


Part I: James Watson’s Nobel Prize sells for $4.8 Million

Screen Shot 2014-12-05 at 11.58.49 PM

This very day, James Watson successfully auctioned off his Nobel Prize to help sustain himself because in 2007, he resigned from his position as chancellor of Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory for this publicly quoted comment in The Times:

“[I am] inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa [because] all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours—whereas all the testing says not really.” He went on to say that despite the desire that all human beings should be equal, “people who have to deal with black employees find this not true.”

Not to apologize for the man, but it would appear that his notable gifts for science were not tempered with a gift for keeping his foot out of his mouth. He has made many an impolitic comment about fat people, unattractive people, gays, the Irish…so there is a history of general unsmartness about his willingness to let notions fly.

As a cosmic bit of irony, if you click on the article linked to his picture, you will read about Watson’s feeling like an “unperson” after being ostracized. Well, isn’t that exactly the issue that everyone had with his proclamation about Africans?  With this quote from the article, we see the universe teaching Watson how it feels to fall from the grace of an accomplished, straight, affluent man of European descent and to feel the marginalization of those “unpersons” that he so glibly judged.

“Because I was an ‘unperson’ I was fired from the boards of companies, so I have no income, apart from my academic income,”

And the irony of this irony is that he wants to buy a David Hockney painting with the proceeds of his sale after having been quoted as saying in the The Sunday Telegraph, in 1997,

“If you could find the gene which determines sexuality and a woman decides she doesn’t want a homosexual child, well, let her.”


Part II:  Harvard discriminates against Asians based on race?

This very day of December 5th, 2014, I also received an email from my alma mater addressing the suit brought by some students alleging racist discrimination against Asian-American applicants in admissions by Harvard, UNC-Chapel Hill, and Univ of Wisconson-Madison.


Harvard suit

Truth be told, and as an Asian-American and a participant in the admissions process for Harvard College, I would concur that the representation of Asians and Jews would be much higher at elite colleges if not for this bit of social engineering but that is not to say that I support this lawsuit. If you were a Caucasian parent with a child up for the same spot as an Asian-American child and all factors were magically equal, would you consider it “affirmative action” if they admitted your child solely based on his or her non-Asiatic heritage?

The main problem I have with the lawsuit is who sponsored it. It is a gentleman who has a very conservative bent and it reeks of an attempt to assault the temporary and vital institution of affirmative action by an means he deems necessary.

Part III: The Nobility of Man

Brits love Ghandi, Southie’s love Bill Russel, former Nazi’s love Anne Frank. They just do.

On the deepest, truest level, any person’s struggle for dignity against attempts to render them “unpersons” is appreciated as it resonates with all our struggles for self-determination and freedom from judgement.

Movies are amazing because the immersion of the mind in darkness and anonymity can transform the human heart. That is one of the reasons I became a screenwriter. Think of “Billy Elliot”, “Glory”, “My Left Foot”, and any number of thousands of wonderful movies. You went in believing one thing, and leave transformed. Sure, when the lights come up in the movie house, you are free to resume your own close-minded bigotry, but there are few amongst us that will not be moved by ANY story, told with truth and empathy, about people we would normally consider “other” or perhaps even inferior.

Flying back from an interview I did for Gaiam TV in Boulder, Colorado yesterday, I was happy to watch “Guardians of the Galaxy” a Marvel Comics picture about a rag-tag band of misfits that saves the galaxy.  In the first non-flashback scene, the hero strolls through a ruin and with a scanning device, appears to pick up scenes of a reality taking place “elsewhere in time” but apparently in the same space.  It is not explained and does not appear central to the plot.

That scene reminded me of an eerie and wonderful film staring David Bowie called “The Man who Fell to Earth” in which he played a spaceman who was somehow not meant to be in this space-time realm; he was a man who was meant to be somewhere else and therefor bore the gifts and scars of that non-Earthly origin.

The reason I bring this up is that perhaps the message of this innocuous movie scene was that we are all guardians of the galaxy and that everything is happening all-at-once. As above, so below. Our world inside, outside, in the past, and in the future are all our responsibility to co-create.

Divine intuition allows us to understand betrayal when we interview face-to-face the unexpected Mary Smith who is obviously at least 50% Chinese- because now we have to temper our enthusiasm for their violin playing or math SAT score.

We can access the self-pity of Jim Watson’s hubris and the shame at having to now live with the consequences of our Tourette’s-like hubris.

And sadly, we feel the surprise and sorrow of being be choked to death by a racist cop just as well as we feel the carnal exhilaration of taking another man’s life in a fit of unbridled rage.

Are we ignorant, bigoted fools?  Yes.

Are we conscious, loving deities?

Yes. Is that a contradiction? No.

So what now?  Pray. Be kind. Learn. And believe only what’s true: that the world we see is the world inside and that we are the ultimate guardians of our galaxy and all our brothers’ keepers. If there is racism on the rise in your reality, then it is incumbent upon you to change that matrix of reality and believe something else into existence.

And don’t forget to ask yourselves: who benefits from activating our scarcity and fear?  Ebola, televised beheadings, school shootings, alleged race riots?  It’s time to pay attention to the men behind the curtains because Emerald City ain’t turning out to be what we were promised in the Bill of Rights. And Dorothy never needed the Wizard or even the Ruby Slippers to get back to Kansas.

4 thoughts on “Racism on the rise? If so, it is your fault!”

  1. Steve Hanson

    I couldn’t read the whole missive, my eyes aren’t good enough and tire easily. But as far as racism is concerned, it’s just a symptom of a much greater problem: the rampant belief that as long as one feels strongly enough about something, it must be true. We have lost our respect for the truth. And science has become as much of a religious cult as the worst truly religious fanatic.
    Any uncorrupted child is a model for the perfect scientist. The pure and uncorrupted child sees the world through a clear lens and only wishes to understand what he/she sees.
    We corrupt our children when we teach them something which is not true and tell them they must simply believe it. That corrupts the structure and from that point on what is true (different than what we believe), no longer matters. Falseness breeds falseness, like a virus.
    Still, we love the children, regardless of race because we see in their purity the beauty we have lost.
    And I think that racism is just a symptom of the hatred we have for ourselves when we lose the purity we had when we began. So, we direct that anger to anything that is away from ourselves. And that doesn’t surprise me either because mental blind-spots breed cowardice.

  2. Stan Bazilian

    Hi, Ed.

    As usual am uplifted by your insights. reflective of your depth of brilliance.
    Just turned 86; still taking TA65 using the formula you suggested, of up to 8/day.
    Energy is excellent; the only member of U of Pa med school class of ’53 still fully working full
    time, with multiple responsibilities as medical director of 2 clinics and a personal
    Case load of 2,000 psychiatric out patients.
    The reps show me stats; I have the highest case load in Philly.

    My deepest thanks for your support and guidance; you have truly added good, functional years to my life.
    With my very best wishes,

    1. My husband and i have been now tlerhlid when Ervin managed to deal with his investigations through the entire ideas he had while using the weblog. It is now and again perplexing to simply always be giving out helpful tips which other folks may have been making money from. We really fully grasp we have got the website owner to give thanks to for that. Those explanations you’ve made, the straightforward website menu, the friendships you will make it possible to foster it’s got all astounding, and it’s letting our son in addition to the family consider that the concept is awesome, which is certainly quite essential. Many thanks for everything!

  3. Pingback: Perception and Reality – Are they equal or is one subordinate? « Lokahi Guru

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

How can I help you?

Drop me a line to find out